From: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Subject: Re: [patch] ext2/3: document conditions when reliable operation is possible
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:30:24 -0500
Message-ID: <200908241730.26356.rob@landley.net>
References: <20090312092114.GC6949@elf.ucw.cz> <20090824130125.GG23677@mit.edu> <4A92A9F9.10706@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>, Florian Weimer <fweimer@bfk.de>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
	Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
	kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, mtk.manpages@gmail.com,
	rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
To: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Return-path: <linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A92A9F9.10706@gmail.com>
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

On Monday 24 August 2009 09:55:53 Artem Bityutskiy wrote:
> Probably, Pavel did too good job in generalizing things, and it could be
> better to make a doc about HDD vs SSD or HDD vs Flash-based-storage.
> Not sure. But the idea to document subtle FS assumption is good, IMO.

The standard procedure for this seems to be to cc: Jonathan Corbet on the 
discussion, make puppy eyes at him, and subscribe to Linux Weekly News.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds