From: "NeilBrown" Subject: Re: raid is dangerous but that's secret Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:23:56 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <6311905a247b1ec1f264f6417ed6d5d6.squirrel@neil.brown.name> References: <20090824212518.GF29763@elf.ucw.cz> <20090825232601.GF4300@elf.ucw.cz> <4A947682.2010204@redhat.com> <200908262253.17886.rob@landley.net> <4A967175.5070700@redhat.com> <20090827221319.GA1601@ucw.cz> <4A9733C1.2070904@redhat.com> <827hwos98u.fsf@mid.bfk.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: "Ric Wheeler" , "Pavel Machek" , "Rob Landley" , "Theodore Tso" , "Goswin von Brederlow" , "kernel list" , "Andrew Morton" , mtk.manpages@gmail.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net To: "Florian Weimer" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <827hwos98u.fsf@mid.bfk.de> Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Fri, August 28, 2009 5:11 pm, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ric Wheeler: > >> You continue to ignore the technical facts that everyone (both MD and >> ext3) people put in front of you. >> >> If you have a specific bug in MD code, please propose a patch. > > In RAID 1 mode, it should read both copies and error out on > mismatch. 8-) Despite your smiley: no it shouldn't, and no one is making any claims about raid1 being unsafe, only raid4/5/6. NeilBrown