From: Jan Kara Subject: [PATCH 08/16] ext2: Update comment about generic_osync_inode Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 15:59:18 +0200 Message-ID: <1251899966-7316-9-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> References: <1251899966-7316-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Cc: LKML , hch@lst.de, Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1251899966-7316-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org We rely on generic_write_sync() now. CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Jan Kara --- fs/ext2/inode.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index e271303..1c1638f 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -482,7 +482,7 @@ static int ext2_alloc_branch(struct inode *inode, unlock_buffer(bh); mark_buffer_dirty_inode(bh, inode); /* We used to sync bh here if IS_SYNC(inode). - * But we now rely upon generic_osync_inode() + * But we now rely upon generic_write_sync() * and b_inode_buffers. But not for directories. */ if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) && IS_DIRSYNC(inode)) -- 1.6.0.2