From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: EXT4: kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:533! Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:30:11 -0400 Message-ID: <20090902223011.GA30497@mit.edu> References: <4A9E5496.8050909@in.ibm.com> <20090902120958.GA16415@mit.edu> <20090902210737.GV4197@webber.adilger.int> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sachin Sant , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:42752 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753261AbZIBWaM (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Sep 2009 18:30:12 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090902210737.GV4197@webber.adilger.int> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 03:07:37PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Given the nature of the test being run (fsstress) it seems entirely > possible that there is some transaction which doesn't reserve enough > credits for the operation in some rare corner case? That's possible, although we're running fsstress in the XFSQA tests. Sanchin, what are the parameters used when you ran fsstress, and how big is the partition in question? How many CPU's are in the PowerPC system in question? Thanks, - Ted