From: Sachin Sant Subject: Re: EXT4: kernel BUG at fs/jbd2/commit.c:533! Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2009 13:06:10 +0530 Message-ID: <4A9F71EA.4070406@in.ibm.com> References: <4A9E5496.8050909@in.ibm.com> <20090902120958.GA16415@mit.edu> <20090902210737.GV4197@webber.adilger.int> <20090902223011.GA30497@mit.edu> <4A9F3F7F.6030304@in.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Dilger , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Aneesh Kumar K.V" To: Theodore Tso Return-path: Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([59.145.155.3]:49783 "EHLO e28smtp03.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752080AbZICHgM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Sep 2009 03:36:12 -0400 Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62]) by e28smtp03.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id n837aCwV021417 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:06:12 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (d28av05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.67]) by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id n837aCO92183320 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 13:06:12 +0530 Received: from d28av05.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av05.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id n837aBPw008053 for ; Thu, 3 Sep 2009 17:36:12 +1000 In-Reply-To: <4A9F3F7F.6030304@in.ibm.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Sachin Sant wrote: > So i have not been able to recreate this again in my last attempt. > I will try couple of time to see if i can recreate this. > > The box under test is a 4 way POWER6. The disk partition (/dev/sda4) > in question is about 19GB. > > fsstress was invoked with -p 50 -n 1000 -c -f dwrite=0 I have a script (thanks to Aneesh) which executes a series of test(like fsstress, fsx-linux and resize) with various ext4 mount options (data=journal, data=ordered, data=ordered,nodelalloc with 1024/4096 as size). While executing the above script for the first time i ran into this bug. After the initial run i have rerun the tests 4 time now, but have not been able to recreate the same issue. [Although 4th time i ran into another issue. Will start a separate thread for that.] As for this issue not sure how to proceed further. I probably will continue to execute the tests few more times. Maybe will try on a different box. thanks -Sachin -- --------------------------------- Sachin Sant IBM Linux Technology Center India Systems and Technology Labs Bangalore, India ---------------------------------