From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 14354] Bad corruption with 2.6.32-rc1 and upwards
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:15:16 GMT
Message-ID: <200910121815.n9CIFGXi020499@demeter.kernel.org>
References:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Return-path:
Received: from demeter.kernel.org ([140.211.167.39]:43425 "EHLO
demeter.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
with ESMTP id S1757469AbZJLSPw (ORCPT
); Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:15:52 -0400
Received: from demeter.kernel.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by demeter.kernel.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n9CIFG8t020500
for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 18:15:16 GMT
In-Reply-To:
Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14354
--- Comment #25 from Theodore Tso 2009-10-12 18:15:15 ---
Hi, I'm trying to track down a problem relating to ext4 problems, in
kernel bugzilla 14354. Originally it was thought this was a regression
2.6.31->2.6.32-rc1 regression, but the Aneesh Kumar's report shows a
very similar fsck transcript using a 2.6.30-1 kernel (which makes makes
it unclear whether this is really a regression or not), and all three
reports are tied together by the use of device-mapper.
The fsck logs are consistent barriers being disabled. As I recall under
some circumstances device mapper silently drops barrier requests --- I
thought this was fixed for device mapper in some cases. What's the
current status of barrier requests in device mapper? Are they
faithfully passed for standard (non-RAID) LVM2 volumes? When was this
changed? What about dm-crypto volumes? (One of the reports was with a
dm-crypt volume from what I can tell.)
Thanks,
- Ted
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.