From: Alexey Fisher Subject: Re: one way to dmesg Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2009 16:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: <1257348551.2091.1.camel@mini> References: <1257344804.2852.11.camel@zwerg> <87f94c370911040718k766d910fr23342c82d4632faa@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Freemyer Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:49893 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1756618AbZKDP3J (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Nov 2009 10:29:09 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87f94c370911040718k766d910fr23342c82d4632faa@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 10:18 -0500 schrieb Greg Freemyer: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Alexey Fisher > wrote: > > Hallo, > > this is sort of continue of discussion about unified way to mount fs > > readonly. > > I wont to know how about dmesg/printk. I see ext[234] produce different > > logs on mount even it use same code. I feel like i have some time to > > digg in. My target is easy to parse dmesg. > > Patches for unified mount messages already exist. Various versions > have been posted in the last couple months. > > I don't know if they have been accepted yet or not. Can you point me this patch? I found only "add a message in remount/umount for ext4" http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/?page=1