From: Michael Evans Subject: Re: [PATCH] resize2fs: exit fix_sb_journal_backup early for external journal Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:18:38 -0800 Message-ID: <4877c76c0911102218t33407ceal81ef0a1e7367653a@mail.gmail.com> References: <4AF88220.90908@redhat.com> <4877c76c0911091954p237058cfn2ce9f41cd966d2dc@mail.gmail.com> <4877c76c0911102125t5eef5cf1y228c02ed9c05d3fd@mail.gmail.com> <4AFA4EAF.8040502@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: ext4 development To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from mail-pw0-f42.google.com ([209.85.160.42]:57354 "EHLO mail-pw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751616AbZKKGSc (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:18:32 -0500 Received: by pwi3 with SMTP id 3so505815pwi.21 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 22:18:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4AFA4EAF.8040502@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I agree it looks like the right thing to do there, but I'm not sure if there's some other effect it's supposed to have. However just based on that small section I should probably be safe if I use the latest RC kernel (for other ext4 reasons that sound important) and then do an fsck -f after the resize.