From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: Ext4 on SSD Intel X25-M Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:13:53 -0500 Message-ID: <20091113141353.GA21183@mit.edu> References: <4AFC14D6.7080700@diamondcut.com.br> <20091112153017.GA32122@mit.edu> <87fx8itzzo.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Renato S. Yamane" , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andi Kleen Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:53565 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753377AbZKMONz (ORCPT ); Fri, 13 Nov 2009 09:13:55 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87fx8itzzo.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 12:39:55PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > Theodore Tso writes: > > > > I have done a few things to reduce needless disk utilization, such as > > using tmpfs for /tmp and configuring firefox to place its cache in > > /tmp, > > OT, but these two together seems rather pointless, could as well > keep it in its own memory then when it's in memory anyways. That will > be faster. Well, technically it's not the same, since tmpfs is swappable --- but in my case where I have 4GB of memory in my laptop and swap is disabled (and perhaps for most users), you're right, it's probably better to increase firefox's memory cache and disable it's disk cache entirely. - Ted