From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: [PATCH] ext4: directory blocks must be treated as metadata by ext4_forget() Date: Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:30:59 -0500 Message-ID: <1258245059-17687-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> References: <20091114232912.GF4221@mit.edu> Cc: Curt Wohlgemuth , Theodore Ts'o To: Ext4 Developers List Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:45926 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751429AbZKOAa4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Nov 2009 19:30:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20091114232912.GF4221@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: When a directory gets unlinked, ext4_forget() is called on any buffer heads corresponding to its data blocks. Data blocks from directories must be treated as metadata, so that they are revoked by jbd2_journal_revoke, and not just forgotten via ext4_journal_forget(). Thanks to Curt Wohlgemuth for pointing out potential problems in this area. Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 13de1dd..639bb84 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int ext4_forget(handle_t *handle, int is_metadata, struct inode *inode, bh, is_metadata, inode->i_mode, test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS)); + /* Directory blocks must be treated as metadata */ + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) + is_metadata = 1; + /* Never use the revoke function if we are doing full data * journaling: there is no need to, and a V1 superblock won't * support it. Otherwise, only skip the revoke on un-journaled -- 1.6.5.216.g5288a.dirty