From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: directory blocks must be treated as metadata by ext4_forget() Date: Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:34:48 +0530 Message-ID: <20091115070447.GA26614@skywalker.linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20091114232912.GF4221@mit.edu> <1258245059-17687-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ext4 Developers List , Curt Wohlgemuth To: "Theodore Ts'o" Return-path: Received: from e28smtp03.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.3]:57253 "EHLO e28smtp03.in.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820AbZKOHEy (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Nov 2009 02:04:54 -0500 Received: from d28relay03.in.ibm.com (d28relay03.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.60]) by e28smtp03.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nAF74rQl012252 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:34:53 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63]) by d28relay03.in.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nAF74qbM2642134 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:34:52 +0530 Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nAF74pSA004398 for ; Sun, 15 Nov 2009 12:34:52 +0530 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1258245059-17687-1-git-send-email-tytso@mit.edu> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:30:59PM -0500, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > When a directory gets unlinked, ext4_forget() is called on any buffer > heads corresponding to its data blocks. Data blocks from directories > must be treated as metadata, so that they are revoked by > jbd2_journal_revoke, and not just forgotten via ext4_journal_forget(). > > Thanks to Curt Wohlgemuth for pointing out potential problems in this > area. > > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" > --- > fs/ext4/inode.c | 4 ++++ > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c > index 13de1dd..639bb84 100644 > --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c > +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c > @@ -97,6 +97,10 @@ int ext4_forget(handle_t *handle, int is_metadata, struct inode *inode, > bh, is_metadata, inode->i_mode, > test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS)); > > + /* Directory blocks must be treated as metadata */ > + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) > + is_metadata = 1; > + > /* Never use the revoke function if we are doing full data > * journaling: there is no need to, and a V1 superblock won't > * support it. Otherwise, only skip the revoke on un-journaled I guess we need to make sure we call ext4_forget with correct is_metadata values. I did the below patch. The xattr changes in the patch should be split as a separate one. I am not sure why we do a get_bh there. Another question i have is, do we actually supporting freeing directory blocks when we delete directory entries ? I remember reading we don't have support for that. So may be Curt is not seeing the ext4_forget being called because he is trying delete of directory entries. I guess he will have to do a rmdir directory to see the directory blocks freed. If you think the changes are correct i will send proper patches with s-o-b -aneesh diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents.c b/fs/ext4/extents.c index 715264b..74dcff8 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/extents.c +++ b/fs/ext4/extents.c @@ -2074,7 +2074,7 @@ static int ext4_remove_blocks(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ext_debug("free last %u blocks starting %llu\n", num, start); for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { bh = sb_find_get_block(inode->i_sb, start + i); - ext4_forget(handle, 0, inode, bh, start + i); + ext4_forget(handle, metadata, inode, bh, start + i); } ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, start, num, metadata); } else if (from == le32_to_cpu(ex->ee_block) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 2c8caa5..87232a5 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -96,6 +96,13 @@ int ext4_forget(handle_t *handle, int is_metadata, struct inode *inode, bh, is_metadata, inode->i_mode, test_opt(inode->i_sb, DATA_FLAGS)); + /* + * The caller should have set is_metadata properly. But + * being extra careful here + */ + if (S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode) || S_ISLNK(inode->i_mode)) + is_metadata = 1; + /* Never use the revoke function if we are doing full data * journaling: there is no need to, and a V1 superblock won't * support it. Otherwise, only skip the revoke on un-journaled diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c index fed5b01..3c93a9a 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c +++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c @@ -482,9 +482,8 @@ ext4_xattr_release_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode, ea_bdebug(bh, "refcount now=0; freeing"); if (ce) mb_cache_entry_free(ce); - ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, bh->b_blocknr, 1, 1); - get_bh(bh); ext4_forget(handle, 1, inode, bh, bh->b_blocknr); + ext4_free_blocks(handle, inode, bh->b_blocknr, 1, 1); } else { le32_add_cpu(&BHDR(bh)->h_refcount, -1); error = ext4_handle_dirty_metadata(handle, inode, bh);