From: Subrata Modak Subject: Re: [LTP] writev data loss bug in (at least) 2.6.31 and 2.6.32pre8 x86-64 Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 20:41:43 +0530 Message-ID: <1259853108.5085.37.camel@subratamodak.linux.ibm.com> References: <1F5364AE-321E-44E9-8B0D-B8E17597A0DA@fuhm.net> <907888CC-F4B2-448F-8F48-B96A566D323B@fuhm.net> <1259667765.9614.19.camel@marge.simson.net> <20091201143558.GB12730@quack.suse.cz> <20091201160324.GA25873@quack.suse.cz> <7A65EEA3-78FD-49C3-B683-265B93F8AC96@sun.com> <20091202105354.f7137c98.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Reply-To: subrata@linux.vnet.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Dilger , ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net, Mike Galbraith , ext4 development , James Y Knight , Jan Kara , npiggin@suse.de To: Randy Dunlap Return-path: Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:37679 "EHLO e34.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756274AbZLCPM1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2009 10:12:27 -0500 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by e34.co.us.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id nB3F7ANf030318 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:07:10 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (d03av04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.170]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id nB3FCRV2162076 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:12:28 -0700 Received: from d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av04.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.3/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id nB392vhI023118 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 02:02:58 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20091202105354.f7137c98.rdunlap@xenotime.net> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 10:53 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: > On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 15:02:04 -0700 Andreas Dilger wrote: > > > On 2009-12-01, at 09:03, Jan Kara wrote: > > > On Tue 01-12-09 15:35:59, Jan Kara wrote: > > >> On Tue 01-12-09 12:42:45, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > >>> On Mon, 2009-11-30 at 19:48 -0500, James Y Knight wrote: > > >>>> On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:55 PM, James Y Knight wrote: > > >>>>> This test case is distilled from an actual application which > > >>>>> doesn't even intentionally use writev: it just uses C++'s > > >>>>> ofstream class to write data to a file. Unfortunately, that > > >>>>> class smart and uses writev under the covers. Unfortunately, I > > >>>>> guess nobody ever tests linux writev behavior, since it's broken > > >>>>> _so_much_of_the_time_. I really am quite astounded to see such a > > >>>>> bad track record for such a fundamental core system call.... > > > > I suspect an excellent way of exposing problems with the writev() > > interface would be to wire it into fsx, which is commonly run as a > > stress test for Linux. I don't know if it would have caught this > > case, but it definitely couldn't hurt to get more testing cycles for it. > > Maybe someone from LTP would be interested in adding this test functionality > to fsx-linux ? > Sure Randy, We will do it. Regards-- Subrata > Source/test program is available at > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125961612418323&w=2 > > > > >> Ext4 also has this problem but delayed allocation mitigates the > > >> effect to an error in accounting of blocks reserved for delayed > > >> allocation and thus under normal circumstances nothing bad happens. > > > > It looks like ext4 might still hit this problem, if delalloc is > > disabled. Could you please submit a similar patch for ext4 also. > > > > > The patch below fixes the issue for me... > > > > > > Honza > > > > > > From 1b2ad411dd86afbfdb3c5b0f913230e9f1f0b858 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Jan Kara > > > Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 16:53:06 +0100 > > > Subject: [PATCH] ext3: Fix data / filesystem corruption when write > > > fails to copy data > > > > > > When ext3_write_begin fails after allocating some blocks or > > > generic_perform_write fails to copy data to write, we truncate > > > blocks already instantiated beyond i_size. Although these blocks > > > were never inside i_size, we have to truncate pagecache of these > > > blocks so that corresponding buffers get unmapped. Otherwise > > > subsequent __block_prepare_write (called because we are retrying the > > > write) will find the buffers mapped, not call ->get_block, and thus > > > the page will be backed by already freed blocks leading to > > > filesystem and data corruption. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara > > > --- > > > fs/ext3/inode.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > > > 1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/fs/ext3/inode.c b/fs/ext3/inode.c > > > index 354ed3b..f9d6937 100644 > > > --- a/fs/ext3/inode.c > > > +++ b/fs/ext3/inode.c > > > @@ -1151,6 +1151,16 @@ static int > > > do_journal_get_write_access(handle_t *handle, > > > return ext3_journal_get_write_access(handle, bh); > > > } > > > > > > +/* > > > + * Truncate blocks that were not used by write. We have to truncate > > > the > > > + * pagecache as well so that corresponding buffers get properly > > > unmapped. > > > + */ > > > +static void ext3_truncate_failed_write(struct inode *inode) > > > +{ > > > + truncate_inode_pages(inode->i_mapping, inode->i_size); > > > + ext3_truncate(inode); > > > +} > > > + > > > static int ext3_write_begin(struct file *file, struct address_space > > > *mapping, > > > loff_t pos, unsigned len, unsigned flags, > > > struct page **pagep, void **fsdata) > > > @@ -1209,7 +1219,7 @@ write_begin_failed: > > > unlock_page(page); > > > page_cache_release(page); > > > if (pos + len > inode->i_size) > > > - ext3_truncate(inode); > > > + ext3_truncate_failed_write(inode); > > > } > > > if (ret == -ENOSPC && ext3_should_retry_alloc(inode->i_sb, &retries)) > > > goto retry; > > > @@ -1304,7 +1314,7 @@ static int ext3_ordered_write_end(struct file > > > *file, > > > page_cache_release(page); > > > > > > if (pos + len > inode->i_size) > > > - ext3_truncate(inode); > > > + ext3_truncate_failed_write(inode); > > > return ret ? ret : copied; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1330,7 +1340,7 @@ static int ext3_writeback_write_end(struct > > > file *file, > > > page_cache_release(page); > > > > > > if (pos + len > inode->i_size) > > > - ext3_truncate(inode); > > > + ext3_truncate_failed_write(inode); > > > return ret ? ret : copied; > > > } > > > > > > @@ -1383,7 +1393,7 @@ static int ext3_journalled_write_end(struct > > > file *file, > > > page_cache_release(page); > > > > > > if (pos + len > inode->i_size) > > > - ext3_truncate(inode); > > > + ext3_truncate_failed_write(inode); > > > return ret ? ret : copied; > > > } > > > > > > -- > > > > Cheers, Andreas > > -- > > Andreas Dilger > > Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group > > Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. > > > --- > ~Randy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Join us December 9, 2009 for the Red Hat Virtual Experience, > a free event focused on virtualization and cloud computing. > Attend in-depth sessions from your desk. Your couch. Anywhere. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/redhat-sfdev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Ltp-list mailing list > Ltp-list@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltp-list