From: lakshmi pathi Subject: Re: [Jfs-discussion] benchmark results Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2009 18:49:19 +0530 Message-ID: References: <19251.26403.762180.228181@tree.ty.sabi.co.uk> <20091224212756.GM21594@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: tytso@mit.edu, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Grandi , ext-users , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Kujau Return-path: Received: from mail-pz0-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:55753 "EHLO mail-pz0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752074AbZLYNTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Dec 2009 08:19:20 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: I'm a file system testing newbie, I have a question/doubt,please let me know if i'm wrong. Do you think a tool, which uses output from "hdparm" command,to get hard drives maximum performance and compares it specific file system (say for example,"ext4 provides xx throughput against max. device throughput yy" ) would be more meaningful. Does using hdparm (or other device throughput related tools) for benchmarking will be useful? Thanks. -- Cheers, Lakshmipathi.G www.giis.co.in