From: Thomas Kupper Subject: Re: mount ext2/3 as ext4 - no changes to ext2/3 fs structures? Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:18:25 +0100 Message-ID: <0081ACB2-54C6-4AE5-B55F-CEAF299CFC7A@kupper.org> References: <88FF0BDF-9F6F-4A2D-A236-C388BFFA145D@kupper.org> <532480951001312154g1c927b31xe0181cc301b5a28d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: linux-ext4 To: Michael Rubin Return-path: Received: from mxout002.mail.hostpoint.ch ([217.26.49.181]:57405 "EHLO mxout002.mail.hostpoint.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755201Ab0BCPS2 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 10:18:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: <532480951001312154g1c927b31xe0181cc301b5a28d@mail.gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 1 Feb 2010, at 06:54, Michael Rubin wrote: > On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Thomas Kupper wrote: >> Consider the following scenario: Assume I have a partition formated with ext2 on a computer with some 2.4.x kernel. Now I mount this ext2 partition on another computer as ext4 using a 2.6.29+ kernel. After that I take the disk back to the older computer and mount the ext2 on the 2.4.x kernel with the ext2 driver. > > I have seen this work as long as you don't add the "extents" or other > ext4 specific mount options. Our kernels are not quite as up to date > as 2.6.29 and we have not done extensive testing with that kernel. Not > sure anyone has tested this case thoroughly. Thanks alot for your answer, that'll do for me to start with. Nothing on computers is guaranteed to work perfect :) > mrubin Cheers, Thomas