From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH] obsolete config in kernel source (BUFFER_DEBUG) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 14:56:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20100208135629.GD4321@quack.suse.cz> References: <20100205131333.GB6540@faui49.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Theodore Ts'o , Kazuo Moriwaka , H Hartley Sweeten , Joel Becker , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, vamos@i4.informatik.uni-erlangen.de To: Christoph Egger Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:39526 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752074Ab0BHN4W (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:56:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100205131333.GB6540@faui49.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri 05-02-10 14:13:33, Christoph Egger wrote: > Hi all! > > As part of the VAMOS[0] research project at the University of > Erlangen we're checking referential integrity between kernel KConfig > options and in-code Conditional blocks. > > With some commit somewhere around 2.4.15 the last hint of > CONFIG_BUFFER_DEBUG (apart from the 2 occurences this patch addresses) > -- some documentation -- was removed from the kernel source. However > this one piece of code made it till today. Time to go forward and > remove it? > > Please keep me informed of this patch getting confirmed / > merged so we can keep track of it. Thanks, the patch looks good. I've merged it into my linux-fs tree and will send it to Linus in the next merge window. Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR