From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: 2.6.33-rc6 crashes on resume Date: Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:32:42 +0900 Message-ID: <4B70D75A.7010600@gmail.com> References: <4B70982F.8090208@roadwarrior3.tmr.com> <201002090016.18027.rjw@sisk.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davidsen@tmr.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pm list , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <201002090016.18027.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On 02/09/2010 08:16 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Pretty simple to reproduce, boot, suspend, press shift >> >> Acer Aspire 1681, Celeron, 2.6.33-rc6. Trace and config attached. > > This looks suspicious: > > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 03/42:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] Starting disk > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata2.00: configured for UDMA/33 > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: firewire_core: rediscovered device fw0 > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 03/45:00:00:00:a0:ef (CFA REQUEST EXTENDED ERROR) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: ACPI cmd 00/0c:00:00:00:a0:ef (NOP) rejected by device (Stat=0x51 Err=0x04) > Feb 8 17:32:47 roadwarrior3 kernel: ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100 These aren't harmful in themselves. It just means that the device failed commands BIOS requested via ACPI. Just in case, does "libata.noacpi=1" make any difference to the oops? Thanks. -- tejun