From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Jbd: fix an assertion, jh->b_transaction should be Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:12:15 -0500 Message-ID: <20100224171215.GH5166@thunk.org> References: <1264391104-10950-1-git-send-email-dingdinghua@nrchpc.ac.cn> <1264391104-10950-2-git-send-email-dingdinghua@nrchpc.ac.cn> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: dingdinghua Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:53592 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755063Ab0BXRMR (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:12:17 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1264391104-10950-2-git-send-email-dingdinghua@nrchpc.ac.cn> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 11:45:03AM +0800, dingdinghua wrote: > --- > fs/jbd/commit.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > I've changed the commit message to read: jbd2: clean up an assertion in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() commit_transaction has the same value as journal->j_running_transaction, so we can simplify the assert statement. This is a pretty simple patch, but I wanted to give you credit, so I assumed that you had meant to add a Signed-off-by: line but just forgot. Please let me know if this was not your intention! - Ted