From: Andreas Dilger Subject: Re: EXT4 is ~2X as slow as XFS (593MB/s vs 304MB/s) for writes? Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2010 01:39:18 -0700 Message-ID: <832C6227-BF34-43C2-8768-1308C00AB17F@sun.com> References: <4B886CA1.9050906@redhat.com> <4B887160.2090606@redhat.com> <4B887548.50508@redhat.com> <20100228054240.GE14646@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Eric Sandeen , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Piszcz To: Justin Piszcz Return-path: Received: from sca-es-mail-2.Sun.COM ([192.18.43.133]:34726 "EHLO sca-es-mail-2.sun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750751Ab0CAIjY (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Mar 2010 03:39:24 -0500 In-reply-to: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2010-02-28, at 07:55, Justin Piszcz wrote: > === CREATE RAID-0 WITH 11 DISKS Have you tried testing with "nice" numbers of disks in your RAID set (e.g. 8 disks for RAID-0, 9 for RAID-5, 10 for RAID-6)? The mballoc code is really much better tuned for power-of-two sized allocations. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.