From: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" Subject: [LSF/VM TOPIC] Re: [Lsf10-pc] Rich-acl discussion for Linus Storage and Filesystem summit Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2010 19:39:06 +0530 Message-ID: <878wa9o5tp.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <87hboypy6v.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1267542978.3099.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1267607061.15025.11.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: lsf10-pc@lists.linuxfoundation.org, "linux-fsdevel\@vger.kernel.org" , "Ext4 Developers List" To: James Bottomley , Trond Myklebust Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1267607061.15025.11.camel@mulgrave.site> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:34:21 +0530, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 10:16 -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 20:28 +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > Suggestion for discussion at LSF summit: > > > > > > Rich-acl patches posted at > > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/17414 helps in > > > defining a new acl format for Linux that can interoperate better with > > > NFSv4 acl and CIFS acl. I would like have a discussion on the new acl > > > > What about NTFS? > > > > > format, rules regarding how to handle file mode changes and acl > > > values. Also how to handle uid to nfs name@domain mapping > > > > > > -aneesh > > > > I very much second this proposal. We've been spinning our wheels on the > > issue of support for non-posix draft acls for far too long. > > So could we take the proposal to the relevant list to see who else wants > to talk about it and whether any of the ground work can be covered > beforehand? > Adding fsdevel, ext4 list. samba will also be interested, but that is subscriber only list -aneesh