From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: consolidate in_range() definisions Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:19:54 -0500 Message-ID: <20100304051954.GA15028@thunk.org> References: <1267627246-12863-1-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> <1267627246-12863-3-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Andreas Dilger To: Akinobu Mita Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:46908 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750718Ab0CDFT5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Mar 2010 00:19:57 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1267627246-12863-3-git-send-email-akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:40:46PM +0900, Akinobu Mita wrote: > There are same in_range() macro definisions in mballoc.h and > balloc.c. This consolidates these in_range() definisions and > use it in extents.c, too > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita > Cc: Andreas Dilger > Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org > Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" I've added all three to the ext4 patch queue, thanks. - Ted