From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: remove unnecessary operation in ext4_mb_normalize_group_request() Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:01:15 -0400 Message-ID: <20100406170115.GJ23670@thunk.org> References: <87wrwzv732.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87bpebnonl.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20100405124814.GP18524@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Aneesh Kumar K. V" , linux-ext4 , Andreas Dilger , Dave Kleikamp To: jing zhang Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:50652 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757084Ab0DFRBS (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Apr 2010 13:01:18 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 10:05:33PM +0800, jing zhang wrote: > > And I want to learn a little about the score on the patchwork web > site, so please guide me to it if you like. http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-ext4/list/ Yes, there's a huge backlog. In general the most recent patches are the ones that I worry about. The oldest ones are there more for archeological digging more than anything else. Patch submitters generally will ping me to remind me of a specific patch if there hasn't been some kind of response in a few weeks... - Ted