From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Ping. Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:14:50 -0400 Message-ID: <20100413181450.GA5720@infradead.org> References: <1268920970-9061-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <87ljd1vtth.fsf@openvz.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com, hch@infradead.org, jack@suse.cz, david@fromorbit.com, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, xemul@openvz.org To: Dmitry Monakhov Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:59035 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751463Ab0DMSOu (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:14:50 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87ljd1vtth.fsf@openvz.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 01:00:58PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > Dmitry Monakhov writes: > > > This is 6'th version of extened inode owner patch-set. > > Please review it tell me what do you think about all this. > > Are you agree with this approach? > > Are you worry about some implementation details? > > Is it ready for merge to some devel's tree? > Ping. I haven't got response about the patchset, just small note about > xattr-name from Andreas. > Please clarify what do you think about whole idea and > current patch-set state. What do i have to do to make a progress? As long as you still have the awkward ifdefs and different semantics for "isolation" vs "not" there's still a NACK from me. But in the end Al will have to decide if he wants to take your patches or not.