From: Evgeniy Ivanov Subject: Re: Question about e2fsck and HTree Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:10:08 +0400 Message-ID: References: <20100424004544.GM14986@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: tytso@mit.edu Return-path: Received: from mail-gy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.160.174]:53689 "EHLO mail-gy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754018Ab0DYWKJ convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 25 Apr 2010 18:10:09 -0400 Received: by gyg13 with SMTP id 13so6017818gyg.19 for ; Sun, 25 Apr 2010 15:10:08 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100424004544.GM14986@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 4:45 AM, wrote: > On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 11:43:30PM +0400, Evgeniy Ivanov wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have a question about ext2/ext3. >> >> As I understand directory indexing is compatible feature, currently = my >> implementations doesn't support HTree. >> I do some things (make kernel and libs) with FS and check it with >> e2fsck: it creates index (everything else is ok, exit status is 1). >> Then I do same things with FS and check again: >> >> HTree directory inode 23316 has an invalid root node. >> >> Is it OK for implementation without directory indexing? > > If your implementation of extN don't support HTree, then it's > important that when you modify a filesystem you clear the inode's > EXT2_INDEX_FL flag. =A0 Then the right thing will happen.... Thank you very much again :) --=20 Evgeniy Ivanov -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html