From: Pavel Emelyanov Subject: Re: Ping to Al Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 16:14:13 +0400 Message-ID: <4BDAC995.2040005@parallels.com> References: <1268920970-9061-1-git-send-email-dmonakhov@openvz.org> <87ljd1vtth.fsf@openvz.org> <20100413181450.GA5720@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Dmitry Monakhov , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger@sun.com, jack@suse.cz, david@fromorbit.com, xemul@openvz.org To: viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk Return-path: Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:30105 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932634Ab0D3RIC (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Apr 2010 13:08:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100413181450.GA5720@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > As long as you still have the awkward ifdefs and different semantics for > "isolation" vs "not" there's still a NACK from me. But in the end Al > will have to decide if he wants to take your patches or not. Hi, Al! Regardless of the Christof's concern about the awkward ifdefs and semantics (we will fix this for sure), can you comment anything on the patchset please. Thanks, Pavel