From: tytso@mit.edu Subject: Re: ext4 df regression introduced by commit 9d0be50 Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 19:32:45 -0400 Message-ID: <20100520233245.GG16634@thunk.org> References: <20100510180531.GA13538@untroubled.org> <20100520161121.GB28963@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <20100520163214.GC28770@untroubled.org> <20100520205911.GA2317@untroubled.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:55635 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755174Ab0ETXcs (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 May 2010 19:32:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100520205911.GA2317@untroubled.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 02:59:11PM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 10:32:14AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote: > > IIRC this only affects NFS clients. The same test running locally on > > the server doesn't show the same problem. I will retest shortly and > > confirm (and also test with 2.6.34). > > Sorry, I was mistaken. Running 'df' either locally or remotely shows > the same results. > > I have been unable to reproduce the problem with a simplified test > program as of yet, and have so far been unable to reproduce the problem > with 2.6.34 with any program either. > > Hopefully this means the problem has been solved, but I'll let you know > if it reappears in 2.6.34 Sorry for not responding right away; I've been a bit swamped lately and this fell through the cracks in my inbox. Yes this is fixed in 2.6.34. The fix for your problem was commit d330a5be. If I have a moment to breathe I'll try to get that backported to the 2.6.33 stable series, but upgrading to 2.6.34 works too. :-) - Ted