From: Al Viro Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 01/17] VFS: introduce helpers for the s_dirty flag Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 23:33:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20100609223326.GC31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <1274795352-3551-1-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <1274795352-3551-2-git-send-email-dedekind1@gmail.com> <20100528132318.0783675a.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100528211432.GM31073@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20100528141755.42958d81.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20100609154448.GC6162@thunk.org> <20100609093157.cd040633.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tytso@mit.edu, Artem Bityutskiy , LKML , Jens Axboe , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Roman Zippel , "Tigran A. Aivazian" , Chris Mason , Boaz Harrosh , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, OGAWA Hirofumi , David Woodhouse , reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Evgeniy Dushistov To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100609093157.cd040633.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 09, 2010 at 09:31:57AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Can we figure out what the new names will be for these accessor > > functions, > > sb_mark_dirty(), sb_mark_clean(), sb_is_dirty(). Fine by me. If Linus doesn't take such a patch, I certainly will and put it into for-next ASAP.