From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Extended file stat functions [ver #2] Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2010 16:27:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4C2BD2CE.1090201@zytor.com> References: <52423201-3DF9-4045-8E8B-FAA915053D56@dilger.ca> <20100630011656.18960.4255.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <26505.1277899544@redhat.com> <30875.1277939713@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andreas Dilger , viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, smfrench@gmail.com, jlayton@redhat.com, mcao@us.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, sjayaraman@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Return-path: Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:49924 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752766Ab0F3X2H (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 19:28:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <30875.1277939713@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 06/30/2010 04:15 PM, David Howells wrote: > > gcc for 32-bit platforms can handle 64-bit numbers. gcc doesn't handle 128-bit > numbers. > gcc for 64-bit platforms does handle 128-bit numbers, but I don't think it does on 32-bit platforms. -hpa