From: David Howells Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Extended file stat functions [ver #2] Date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 01:15:37 +0100 Message-ID: <8331.1277943337@redhat.com> References: <4C2BD2CE.1090201@zytor.com> <52423201-3DF9-4045-8E8B-FAA915053D56@dilger.ca> <20100630011656.18960.4255.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <26505.1277899544@redhat.com> <30875.1277939713@redhat.com> Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andreas Dilger , viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, smfrench@gmail.com, jlayton@redhat.com, mcao@us.ibm.com, aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, sjayaraman@suse.de, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: "H. Peter Anvin" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12542 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753391Ab0GAAPw (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Jun 2010 20:15:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4C2BD2CE.1090201@zytor.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: H. Peter Anvin wrote: > gcc for 64-bit platforms does handle 128-bit numbers, but I don't think > it does on 32-bit platforms. How do you specify them? If I say "long long long" gcc moans that it can't support it on x86_64. David