From: Dan Magenheimer Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 10:43:17 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <537098fb-f049-482a-97cf-b3695bf2c340@default> References: <20100621231809.GA11111@ca-server1.us.oracle.com4C49468B.40307@vflare.org> <840b32ff-a303-468e-9d4e-30fc92f629f8@default> <20100723140440.GA12423@infradead.org> <364c83bd-ccb2-48cc-920d-ffcf9ca7df19@default 4C49AFAE.1070300@vflare.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Christoph Hellwig , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Chris Mason , viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, adilger@Sun.COM, tytso@mit.edu, mfasheh@suse.com, Joel Becker , matthew@wil.cx, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, jeremy@goop.org, JBeulich@novell.com, Kurt Hackel , npiggin@suse.de, Dave Mccracken , riel@redhat.com, avi@redhat.com, Konrad Wilk To: ngupta@vflare.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4C49AFAE.1070300@vflare.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org > From: Nitin Gupta [mailto:ngupta@vflare.org] > Sent: Friday, July 23, 2010 9:05 AM > To: Dan Magenheimer > Cc: Christoph Hellwig; akpm@linux-foundation.org; Chris Mason; > viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk; adilger@sun.com; tytso@mit.edu; > mfasheh@suse.com; Joel Becker; matthew@wil.cx; linux- > btrfs@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux- > fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org; ocfs2- > devel@oss.oracle.com; linux-mm@kvack.org; jeremy@goop.org; > JBeulich@novell.com; Kurt Hackel; npiggin@suse.de; Dave Mccracken; > riel@redhat.com; avi@redhat.com; Konrad Wilk > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/8] Cleancache: overview >=20 > On 07/23/2010 08:14 PM, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > >> From: Christoph Hellwig [mailto:hch@infradead.org] >=20 >=20 > >> Also making the ops vector global is just a bad idea. > >> There is nothing making this sort of caching inherently global. > > > > I'm not sure I understand your point, but two very different > > users of cleancache have been provided, and more will be > > discussed at the MM summit next month. > > > > Do you have a suggestion on how to avoid a global ops > > vector while still serving the needs of both existing > > users? >=20 > Maybe introduce cleancache_register(struct cleancache_ops *ops)? > This will allow making cleancache_ops non-global. No value add > but maybe that's cleaner? Oh, OK, that seems reasonable. Dan -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org