From: Chris Frost Subject: Re: [PATCH] mke2fs.8.in: correct the sign of a block-size constraint. Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 21:11:09 -0700 Message-ID: <20100729041108.GA6251@pooh.frostnet.net> References: <20100724220124.GO4032@pooh.frostnet.net> <4C4BC3DB.5000008@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Eric Sandeen Return-path: Received: from owl.frostnet.net ([205.134.225.164]:45347 "EHLO owl.frostnet.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750767Ab0G2ELX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:11:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C4BC3DB.5000008@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 11:55:55PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > wow I didn't even know that behavior existed. > > How about "If block-size is preceded by a negative sign ("-"), then mke2fs > will use heuristics to determine the appropriate block size, with the > constraint that the block size will be at least block-size bytes." I think this is more readable; thanks! -- Chris Frost http://www.frostnet.net/chris/