From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] mm: add nofail variants of kmalloc kcalloc and kzalloc Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:55:29 +0200 Message-ID: <1282769729.1975.96.camel@laptop> References: <1282656558.2605.2742.camel@laptop> <4C73CA24.3060707@fusionio.com> <20100825112433.GB4453@thunk.org> <1282736132.2605.3563.camel@laptop> <20100825115709.GD4453@thunk.org> <1282740516.2605.3644.camel@laptop> <1282740778.2605.3652.camel@laptop> <1282743090.2605.3696.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: Theodore Tso , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Alasdair G Kergon , Chris Mason , Steven Whitehouse , Jan Kara , Frederic Weisbecker , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "cluster-devel@redhat.com" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: David Rientjes Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-raid-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 13:43 -0700, David Rientjes wrote: > The cpusets case is actually the easiest to fix: use GFP_ATOMIC. I don't think that's a valid usage of GFP_ATOMIC, I think we should fallback to outside the cpuset for kernel allocations by default.