From: Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [patch 1/5] mm: add nofail variants of kmalloc kcalloc and kzalloc Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:16:19 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: References: <1282656558.2605.2742.camel@laptop> <4C73CA24.3060707@fusionio.com> <20100825112433.GB4453@thunk.org> <1282736132.2605.3563.camel@laptop> <20100825115709.GD4453@thunk.org> <1282740516.2605.3644.camel@laptop> <20100825132417.GQ31488@dastard> <1282743342.2605.3707.camel@laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Dave Chinner , Ted Ts'o , Jens Axboe , Andrew Morton , Neil Brown , Alasdair G Kergon , Chris Mason , Steven Whitehouse , Jan Kara , Frederic Weisbecker , "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" , "cluster-devel@redhat.com" , "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" , "reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" To: David Rientjes Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: reiserfs-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 25 Aug 2010, David Rientjes wrote: > Because we can remove the flag, remove branches from the page allocator > slowpath, and none of these allocations actually are dependent on > __GFP_NOFAIL since they are all under PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER. Then we can simply remove __GFP_NOFAIL? Functions are only needed for higher order allocs that can fail?