From: Namhyung Kim Subject: [PATCH UPDATED] ext2: trivial: fix typo on comments in ext2/inode.c Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:39:29 +0900 Message-ID: <87eid2peb2.fsf@gmail.com> References: <1283962489-15842-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1283962489-15842-1-git-send-email-namhyung@gmail.com> (Namhyung Kim's message of "Thu, 9 Sep 2010 01:14:49 +0900") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org 'excpet' should be 'except'. 'ext3_get_branch' should be 'ext2_get_branch'. Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim --- I found another one. diff --git a/fs/ext2/inode.c b/fs/ext2/inode.c index 940c961..533699c 100644 --- a/fs/ext2/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext2/inode.c @@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ failed_out: * the same format as ext2_get_branch() would do. We are calling it after * we had read the existing part of chain and partial points to the last * triple of that (one with zero ->key). Upon the exit we have the same - * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), excpet that in one + * picture as after the successful ext2_get_block(), except that in one * place chain is disconnected - *branch->p is still zero (we did not * set the last link), but branch->key contains the number that should * be placed into *branch->p to fill that gap. @@ -662,7 +662,7 @@ static int ext2_get_blocks(struct inode *inode, mutex_lock(&ei->truncate_mutex); /* * If the indirect block is missing while we are reading - * the chain(ext3_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or + * the chain(ext2_get_branch() returns -EAGAIN err), or * if the chain has been changed after we grab the semaphore, * (either because another process truncated this branch, or * another get_block allocated this branch) re-grab the chain to see if -- 1.7.2.2