From: Eric Sandeen Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] Fs: ext4: acl.c: fixed indent issue Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:52:38 -0500 Message-ID: <4CA0A1A6.2050707@redhat.com> References: <1285439521-2557-1-git-send-email-tdent48227@gmail.com> <20100925235459.GA5299@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: "Ted Ts'o" , Tracey Dent , adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, jack@suse.cz, dmonakhov@openvz.org, sandeen@redhat.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-ker Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35075 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755067Ab0I0Nww (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:52:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20100925235459.GA5299@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Ted Ts'o wrote: > On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 02:31:52PM -0400, Tracey Dent wrote: >> From: Tracey Dent >> >> Found and corrected indent issue using checkpatch.pl >> >> Signed-off-by: Tracey Dent > > Patches that fix whitespace issues aren't really worthwhile. They > tend to cause extra work for the me as the maintainer, since it means > that patches that others send me end up failing due to whitespace > issues, which then have to be manually fixed up. > I second that sentiment, despite being guilty of similar patches to other subsystems in the distant past ;) I've seen the light. I would prefer that these not get merged. -Eric