From: "Daniel Taylor" Subject: ext over RAID-[56]? Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: <25B374CC0D9DFB4698BB331F82CD0CF20D5FE3@wdscexbe08.sc.wdc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT To: Return-path: Received: from wdscspam2.wdc.com ([129.253.170.131]:23656 "EHLO wdscspam2.wdc.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756929Ab0JQA3v convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 16 Oct 2010 20:29:51 -0400 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: One of the program managers here asked me a question that I couldn't answer: with ext[34] over a RAID-[56] volume, what protection against data corruption and loss of existing data does the file system provide for the case of an incomplete update of the RAID "stripe"? I know that anyone with any usable brain cells has their data server on a nice UPS, but not all customers are so equipped, and he's concerned about corruption during a power failure (loss of unwritten data is OK). I can't see any configuration options that would help but I could easily be missing something. Any ideas? Thanks, Dan Taylor Sr. Staff Engineer WD Branded Products