From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fs: Do not dispatch FITRIM through separate super_operation Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:10:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20101119141007.GB25488__7679.3089313016$1290175852$gmane$org@infradead.org> References: <1290065809-3976-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <20101118130630.GJ6178@parisc-linux.org> <20101118134804.GN5618@dhcp231-156.rdu.redhat.com> <20101118141957.GK6178@parisc-linux.org> <20101118142918.GA18510@infradead.org> <1290100750.3041.72.camel@mulgrave.site> <1290168976.2570.45.camel@dolmen> <4CE68155.50705@teksavvy.com> <20101119140203.GC10039@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii To: Ted Ts'o , Mark Lord , Steven Whitehouse , Lukas Czerner , James Bottomley , Ch Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:54774 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754554Ab0KSOKL (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:10:11 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101119140203.GC10039@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 09:02:03AM -0500, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Deterministic TRIM is an option. It doesn't have to be implemented. For reasonable use it has to. That rationale for it is pretty clearly outline in ftp://ftp.t10.org/t10/document.08/08-347r1.pdf.