From: Matt Mackall Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Fix memory leak in groupinfo cache name Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 11:05:09 -0600 Message-ID: <1290445509.10595.105.camel@calx> References: <1290376931-2129-1-git-send-email-zeng.zhaoming@freescale.com> <1290376931-2129-2-git-send-email-zeng.zhaoming@freescale.com> <4CEA1208.4060005@cs.helsinki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: zeng.zhaoming@freescale.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, rientjes@google.com, Zeng Zhaoming , Christoph Lameter , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , LKML To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Received: from waste.org ([173.11.57.241]:37873 "EHLO waste.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751291Ab0KVRFN (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Nov 2010 12:05:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CEA1208.4060005@cs.helsinki.fi> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 08:47 +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On 11/22/10 12:02 AM, zeng.zhaoming@freescale.com wrote: > > From: Zeng Zhaoming > > > > please check the discuss with allocator guys. > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=129004890020256&w=2 > > > > Get a memory leak about ext4: > > comm "mount", pid 1159, jiffies 4294904647 (age 6077.804s) > > hex dump (first 32 bytes): > > 65 78 74 34 5f 67 72 6f 75 70 69 6e 66 6f 5f 31 ext4_groupinfo_1 > > 30 00 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b 6b a5 0.kkkkkkkkkkkkk. > > backtrace: > > [] kmemleak_alloc+0x93/0xd0 > > [] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x30c/0x380 > > [] kstrdup+0x33/0x60 > > [] ext4_mb_init+0x4e0/0x550 > > [] ext4_fill_super+0x1e6e/0x2f60 > > [] mount_bdev+0x1c0/0x1f0 > > [] ext4_mount+0x1f/0x30 > > [] vfs_kern_mount+0x78/0x250 > > [] do_kern_mount+0x3e/0x100 > > [] do_mount+0x2e2/0x780 > > [] sys_mount+0xa4/0xd0 > > [] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38 > > [] 0xffffffff > > > > ext4 allocate memory for cache name by: > > namep = kstrdup(name, GFP_KERNEL); > > and reclaim it by: > > name = kmem_cache_name(cache); > > kfree(name) > > > > This is ok if allocator only reference to the cache name memory, and return > > the name memory pass to kmem_cache_create() by kmem_cache_name(); > > But not true in slub, when using slub, memory leak and double free error appears. > > > > In this patch, we track the cache name memory in ext4, rather than allocator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Zeng Zhaoming > > --- > > Hmm. Maybe it's better to change SLAB and SLOB to do kstrdup() > internally so we can drop it from ext4 code. Matt, are you OK with that? If we drop the kmem_cache_name interface, then SLOB can drop tracking the name entirely. -- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.