From: Heinz Diehl Subject: Re: hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 13:49:49 +0100 Message-ID: <20101205124949.GA8266@fritha.org> References: <4CF692D1.1010906@redhat.com> <4CF6B3E8.2000406@redhat.com> <20101201212310.GA15648@redhat.com> <20101204193828.GB13871@redhat.com> <20101205100954.GA6564@fritha.org> <4CFB679D.5030900@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matt , Mike Snitzer , Andi Kleen , linux-btrfs , dm-devel , Linux Kernel , htd , Chris Mason , htejun@gmail.com, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Jon Nelson To: Milan Broz Return-path: Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:58382 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755356Ab0LEMuK (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2010 07:50:10 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CFB679D.5030900@redhat.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 05.12.2010, Milan Broz wrote: > Which kernel? 2.6.37-rc? 2.6.37-rc4 on one and 2.6.37-rc3-git2 on the other machine. > Anyone seen this with 2.6.36 and the same dmcrypt patch? > (All info I had is that is is stable with here.) Both 2.6.36 and 2.6.36.1 with your patch have been running flawlessly. Not a single problem at all, over several weeks. 24/7. > It still seems to like dmcrypt with its parallel processing is just > trigger to another bug in 37-rc. That's the impression I got, too.