From: Ted Ts'o Subject: Re: [dm-devel] hunt for 2.6.37 dm-crypt+ext4 corruption? Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:02:59 -0500 Message-ID: <20101205140259.GB4273@thunk.org> References: <4CF6B3E8.2000406@redhat.com> <20101201212310.GA15648@redhat.com> <20101204193828.GB13871@redhat.com> <20101205100954.GA6564@fritha.org> <4CFB679D.5030900@redhat.com> <1B43E57B-8DA5-4B34-A8D4-18A710CC8BA7@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Heinz Diehl , Jon Nelson , htejun@gmail.com, Mike Snitzer , Linux Kernel , Andi Kleen , Chris Mason , htd , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs , device-mapper development To: Matt Return-path: Received: from thunk.org ([69.25.196.29]:46498 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754255Ab0LEODM (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2010 09:03:12 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 05, 2010 at 02:44:14PM +0100, Matt wrote: > gcc version 4.5.1 (Gentoo Hardened 4.5.1-r1 p1.4, pie-0.4.5) This is probably just me being paranoid, but it might be worth trying using a gcc 4.4.x compiler and see if that makes any difference. There have been some other gcc 4.5-caused probablems with the kernel, and it might be a good idea to rule those out. (I'm using gcc 4.4.3, myself, and I'm deliberately avoiding the use of gcc 4.5 for now.) - Ted