From: Rogier Wolff Subject: Re: Uneven load on my raid disks. Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 10:18:25 +0100 Message-ID: <20101228091825.GC1351@bitwizard.nl> References: <20101228090749.GB1351@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Rogier Wolff Return-path: Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.101.171.8]:57361 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751588Ab0L1JS0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Dec 2010 04:18:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101228090749.GB1351@bitwizard.nl> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:07:49AM +0100, Rogier Wolff wrote: > dumpe2fs without -h takes a long time. I just stopped all rm processes > and now only dumpe2fs is running. It seems to be causing about 10times > more load on sdb than on the other drives. strace shows that it is in > a loop where it seeks/reads. It is alternating reads of 4k and 280 > bytes. OK. I did this wrong: there were also other things running. Whatever dumpe2fs is doing distributes nicely over the four disks. Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ