From: Olaf van der Spek Subject: Re: Atomic non-durable file write API Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:22:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20101224095105.GG12763@thunk.org> <20101225031529.GA2595@thunk.org> <20101226221016.GF2595@thunk.org> <4D18B106.4010308@ontolinux.com> <4D18E94C.3080908@ontolinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, "Ted Ts'o" , Nick Piggin To: Christian Stroetmann Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4D18E94C.3080908@ontolinux.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 8:30 PM, Christian Stroetmann wrote: > Btw.: There is even no analogy: "The concepts are the same". So? Doesn't mean you implement full ACID DB-like transactions. >>>> Still waiting on any hint for why that performance loss would happen. >>> >>> > From my point of view, the loss of performance depends on what is >>> benchmarked in which way. >> >> Maybe, but still no indication of why. > > If you have a solution, then you really should show other persons the > working source code. I don't have source code. Are you not capable of reasoning about something without having concrete source code? > For me speaking: I like such technologies and I'm also interested in your > attempts. Writing code is a lot of work and one should have the design clear before writing code, IMO. Olaf