From: Theodore Tso Subject: Re: fsck performance. Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:32:17 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20110220231514.GC21917@bitwizard.nl> <20110220234131.GC4001@thunk.org> <20110222102056.GH21917@bitwizard.nl> <20110222133652.GI21917@bitwizard.nl> <20110222135431.GK21917@bitwizard.nl> <386B23FA-CE6E-4D9C-9799-C121B2E8C3BB@dilger.ca> <20110222221304.GH2924@thunk.org> <20110223044427.GM21917@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Rogier Wolff Return-path: Received: from DMZ-MAILSEC-SCANNER-2.MIT.EDU ([18.9.25.13]:63677 "EHLO dmz-mailsec-scanner-2.mit.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753025Ab1BWLhY convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Feb 2011 06:37:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110223044427.GM21917@bitwizard.nl> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Feb 22, 2011, at 11:44 PM, Rogier Wolff wrote: > > I'll shoot off an Email to the TDB guys as well. I'm pretty sure this won't come as a surprise to them. I'm using the last version of TDB which was licensed under the GPLv2, and they relicensed to GPLv3 quite a while ago. I remember hearing they had added a new hash algorithm to TDB since the relicensing, but those newer versions aren't available to e2fsprogs.... -- Ted