From: Rogier Wolff Subject: Re: Proposed design for big allocation blocks for ext4 Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:39:29 +0100 Message-ID: <20110225103929.GD15464@bitwizard.nl> References: <1F9A85BD-4B5E-488C-B903-0AE17AACF2B7@dilger.ca> <20110225091559.GC15464@bitwizard.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Rogier Wolff , Theodore Ts'o , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Andreas Dilger Return-path: Received: from cust-95-128-94-82.breedbanddelft.nl ([95.128.94.82]:40045 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S932324Ab1BYKjb (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 05:39:31 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:01:08AM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote: .... I was babbling.... > That is the time to load bitmaps in a non-flex_bg filesystem, which is > the default for ext3-formatted filesystems. OK! Already done! Then I don't really understand what the problem is, so better ignore me. :-) Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ