From: Rogier Wolff Subject: Re: fsck.ext4 taking months Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2011 10:34:03 +0200 Message-ID: <20110330083402.GC30384@bitwizard.nl> References: <4D8F1F75.8010201@psi5.com> <20110328154730.GD21075@thunk.org> <4D9256E2.4040603@psi5.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ted Ts'o , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org To: Christian Brandt Return-path: Received: from cust-95-128-94-82.breedbanddelft.nl ([95.128.94.82]:34674 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754574Ab1C3IeI (ORCPT ); Wed, 30 Mar 2011 04:34:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D9256E2.4040603@psi5.com> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:02:10AM +0200, Christian Brandt wrote: > Can stopping fsck.ext4 now damage things even more? In contrast to fsck.reiser: not likely. I dropped reiser when it did this to me and it cost me 6 hours of my night sleep. Roger. -- ** R.E.Wolff@BitWizard.nl ** http://www.BitWizard.nl/ ** +31-15-2600998 ** ** Delftechpark 26 2628 XH Delft, The Netherlands. KVK: 27239233 ** *-- BitWizard writes Linux device drivers for any device you may have! --* Q: It doesn't work. A: Look buddy, doesn't work is an ambiguous statement. Does it sit on the couch all day? Is it unemployed? Please be specific! Define 'it' and what it isn't doing. --------- Adapted from lxrbot FAQ