From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Bj=F6rn?= JACKE Subject: Re: [PATCH -V5 00/24] New ACL format for better NFSv4 acl interoperability Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 00:16:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <1298469131-16555-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g" To: Ted Ts'o , "Aneesh Kumar K.V" , sfrench@us.ibm.com, agruen@linbit.com, dilger.kernel@dilger.ca, sandeen@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.or Return-path: Received: from mail1.SerNet.de ([193.175.80.2]:58566 "EHLO mail.SerNet.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751849Ab1EKX74 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 May 2011 19:59:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110228211145.GG28617@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On 2011-02-28 at 16:11 -0500 Ted Ts'o sent off: > What is the current status of this patch series? I seem to remember > that Christoph and Al Viro had some objections; have those been > cleared yet? If not, can you summarize what their objections are? >=20 > To be honest I haven't been paying super close attention to this patch > series, and I'm curious what needs to happen with it one way or > another. after the discussion of this path submission thread are there any major or minor issues left that prevent these to go upstream? I'd really love to see NFSv4 ACLs being available on Linux, too. Cheers Bj=F6rn --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux) iEYEAREDAAYFAk3LCq0ACgkQdoo0s+hIejnNDQCfaSJOqCApOflElPSFaoZyR8cb x+cAnAo+J0M54Xew09v2pPF4RIl3Ed9O =Vaef -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2fHTh5uZTiUOsy+g--