From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 11:30:43 -0500
Message-ID: <1305217843.2575.57.camel@mulgrave.site>
References: <1305127773-10570-1-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
	 <1305127773-10570-4-git-send-email-mgorman@suse.de>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105120942050.24560@router.home>
	 <1305213359.2575.46.camel@mulgrave.site>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105121024350.26013@router.home>
	 <1305214993.2575.50.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110512154649.GB4559@redhat.com>
	 <1305216023.2575.54.camel@mulgrave.site>
	 <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105121121120.26013@router.home>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Andrew
 Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
 Raghavendra D Prabhu <raghu.prabhu13@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
 Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
 Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
 linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm
 <linux-mm@kvack.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
 linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Return-path: <owner-linux-mm@kvack.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1105121121120.26013@router.home>
Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org
List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 2011-05-12 at 11:27 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 12 May 2011, James Bottomley wrote:
> 
> > However, the fact remains that this seems to be a slub problem and it
> > needs fixing.
> 
> Why are you so fixed on slub in these matters?

Because, as has been hashed out in the thread, changing SLUB to SLAB
makes the hang go away.

>  Its an key component but
> there is a high interaction with other subsystems. There was no recent
> change in slub that changed the order of allocations. There were changes
> affecting the reclaim logic. Slub has been working just fine with the
> existing allocation schemes for a long time.

So suggest an alternative root cause and a test to expose it.

James


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>