From: Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mm: slub: Default slub_max_order to 0 Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 19:51:04 +0200 Message-ID: <20110512175104.GM11579@random.random> References: <1305213359.2575.46.camel@mulgrave.site> <1305214993.2575.50.camel@mulgrave.site> <20110512154649.GB4559@redhat.com> <1305216023.2575.54.camel@mulgrave.site> <1305217843.2575.57.camel@mulgrave.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: James Bottomley , Christoph Lameter , Dave Jones , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Colin King , Raghavendra D Prabhu , Jan Kara , Chris Mason , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , linux-fsdevel , linux-mm , linux-kernel , linux-ext4 To: Pekka Enberg Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 08:11:05PM +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > If it's this: > > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/gitweb/?p=kernel.git;a=blob_plain;f=config-x86_64-generic;hb=HEAD > > I'd love to see what happens if you disable > > CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y > > because that's going to reduce high order allocations as well, no? Well THP forces COMPACTION=y so lumpy won't risk to be activated. I got once a complaint asking not to make THP force COMPACTION=y (there is no real dependency here, THP will just call alloc_pages with __GFP_NO_KSWAPD and order 9, or 10 on x86-nopae), but I preferred to keep it forced exactly to avoid issues like these when THP is on. If even order 3 is causing troubles (which doesn't immediately make lumpy activated, it only activates when priority is < DEF_PRIORITY-2, so after 2 loops failing to reclaim nr_to_reclaim pages), imagine what was happening at order 9 every time firefox, gcc and mutt allocated memory ;). -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/ Don't email: email@kvack.org