From: "Darrick J. Wong" Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v3.1 0/7] data integrity: Stabilize pages during writeback for various fses Date: Mon, 16 May 2011 13:55:35 -0700 Message-ID: <20110516205535.GP20579@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20110509230318.19566.66202.stgit@elm3c44.beaverton.ibm.com> <20110516190427.GN20579@tux1.beaverton.ibm.com> <20110516202710.GA32630@infradead.org> Reply-To: djwong@us.ibm.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Theodore Tso , Jan Kara , Alexander Viro , OGAWA Hirofumi , Jens Axboe , "Martin K. Petersen" , Jeff Layton , Dave Chinner , linux-kernel , Dave Hansen , linux-mm@kvack.org, Chris Mason , Joel Becker , linux-scsi , linux-fsdevel , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Mingming Cao To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110516202710.GA32630@infradead.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 04:27:10PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Whay about just sending the VFS patches to Al Al was in the To: list of all 7 patches. > instead of talking about it on a totally irrelevant call that doesn't include > the important stakeholders? FS-specific patches can go through the fs > maintainers independently. The maintainers (ext4/ext2/vfat) were also in the To: list. Trouble is, MAINTAINERS says this: MEMORY MANAGEMENT L: linux-mm@kvack.org W: http://www.linux-mm.org S: Maintained F: include/linux/mm.h F: mm/ There's a list, but no specific contact person. That's why I had to start asking around about who actually pushes mm changes to Linus. As for Al Viro, he's still listed as the VFS maintainer; isn't he resting? I guess he did nominate you for the holding off of morons (like me). :) --D