From: Manish Katiyar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] jbd2: Add extra parameter in start_this_handle() to control allocation flags. Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:32:12 -0700 Message-ID: References: <1306563416-4286-1-git-send-email-mkatiyar@gmail.com> <1306563657-4334-1-git-send-email-mkatiyar@gmail.com> <20110531112253.GD5614@quack.suse.cz> <20110531222720.GA3867@thunk.org> <20110602095424.GA5718@quack.suse.cz> <20110606032113.GC7180@thunk.org> <20110608141006.GG30037@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org To: "Ted Ts'o" Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]:40724 "EHLO mail-qy0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753227Ab1FQGcc (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2011 02:32:32 -0400 Received: by qyg14 with SMTP id 14so1162001qyg.19 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:32:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20110608141006.GG30037@thunk.org> Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > Ping? Hi Jan, Is there anything required from my side on this patch ? From your other post it seems that holding i_mutex isn't a problem. Please advise. -- Thanks - Manish