From: Jan Kara Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] jbd2: Add extra parameter in start_this_handle() to control allocation flags. Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 16:32:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20110620143201.GD4810@quack.suse.cz> References: <1306563416-4286-1-git-send-email-mkatiyar@gmail.com> <1306563657-4334-1-git-send-email-mkatiyar@gmail.com> <20110531112253.GD5614@quack.suse.cz> <20110531222720.GA3867@thunk.org> <20110602095424.GA5718@quack.suse.cz> <20110606032113.GC7180@thunk.org> <20110608141006.GG30037@thunk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ted Ts'o , Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, mfasheh@suse.com, jlbec@evilplan.org To: Manish Katiyar Return-path: Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:58035 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753960Ab1FTOcE (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 10:32:04 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-ext4-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi, On Thu 16-06-11 23:32:12, Manish Katiyar wrote: > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:10 AM, Ted Ts'o wrote: > > Ping? > > Is there anything required from my side on this patch ? From your > other post it seems that holding i_mutex isn't a problem. Please > advise. OK, after my discussion with Ted today, i_mutex really shouldn't be an issue so your patch should be fine. I just suggest you resend it to Ted to remind yourself :). Honza -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR